<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XMLSucks? .. Maybe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.landspurg.net/xmlsucks-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/xmlsucks-maybe/</link>
	<description>Technology, wireless, games...and more.....</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phu</title>
		<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/xmlsucks-maybe/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Phu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.landspurg.net/xmlsucks-maybe#comment-959</guid>
		<description>It have been done better!

In section "7. Verbosity" Aaron Crane explains that "XML is hideously verbose for humans — just like SGML".  It provide an alternative bracketed notation.  Such notation already exists: symbolic expression (1958).

Forty years after, XML came out, heavier, uglier (cf. CDATA patch), harder to parse...  It seems that James Clark and Tim Bray missed the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It have been done better!</p>
<p>In section &#8220;7. Verbosity&#8221; Aaron Crane explains that &#8220;XML is hideously verbose for humans — just like SGML&#8221;.  It provide an alternative bracketed notation.  Such notation already exists: symbolic expression (1958).</p>
<p>Forty years after, XML came out, heavier, uglier (cf. CDATA patch), harder to parse&#8230;  It seems that James Clark and Tim Bray missed the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
