<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Widgets: the next portability nightmare?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare/</link>
	<description>Technology, wireless, games...and more.....</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TomSoft</title>
		<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare/#comment-10621</link>
		<dc:creator>TomSoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare#comment-10621</guid>
		<description>Thanks Philip...There is also protopage which seems interesting. 

For dekstoptwo, it seems to be more a desktop replacement? I did not go through the full registration phase, as  you need to provide your full email parameters (username, password, server, etc..) which seems to be a little bit too much. Moste of these services offer usually an access without being registered, and a fast way to register, which seems to be the missing point of desktoptwo....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Philip&#8230;There is also protopage which seems interesting. </p>
<p>For dekstoptwo, it seems to be more a desktop replacement? I did not go through the full registration phase, as  you need to provide your full email parameters (username, password, server, etc..) which seems to be a little bit too much. Moste of these services offer usually an access without being registered, and a fast way to register, which seems to be the missing point of desktoptwo&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of the Mobilists #50 at MobHappy</title>
		<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare/#comment-10553</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of the Mobilists #50 at MobHappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare#comment-10553</guid>
		<description>[...] Anders Borg takes a look at the effort required to create mobile apps and services, and says that despite its shortcomings, Java ME remains about the best choice for application development. One of those shortcomings is fragmentation caused by the different implementations of Java by different handset manufacturers. Jason at Paxmodept chimed in this week with a look at the recently announced third-quarter handset figures, but from a developer&#8217;s perspective, noting how manufacturers&#8217; market share translates in development environments. And while we&#8217;re talking about fragmentation, Thomas Landspurg wonders if widgets will present the next interoperability nightmare. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Anders Borg takes a look at the effort required to create mobile apps and services, and says that despite its shortcomings, Java ME remains about the best choice for application development. One of those shortcomings is fragmentation caused by the different implementations of Java by different handset manufacturers. Jason at Paxmodept chimed in this week with a look at the recently announced third-quarter handset figures, but from a developer&#8217;s perspective, noting how manufacturers&#8217; market share translates in development environments. And while we&#8217;re talking about fragmentation, Thomas Landspurg wonders if widgets will present the next interoperability nightmare. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip H.</title>
		<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare/#comment-10550</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare#comment-10550</guid>
		<description>I think there's one website you forget it to say , or better two websites Pageflakes.com and desktoptwo , they are big fish and they are on the fight for the web 2.0 . Recently, pageflakes launched a new version of their system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s one website you forget it to say , or better two websites Pageflakes.com and desktoptwo , they are big fish and they are on the fight for the web 2.0 . Recently, pageflakes launched a new version of their system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomSoft</title>
		<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare/#comment-9941</link>
		<dc:creator>TomSoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare#comment-9941</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lindsey, very interesting document! I will add it in the post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lindsey, very interesting document! I will add it in the post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare/#comment-9929</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.landspurg.net/widgets-the-next-portability-nightmare#comment-9929</guid>
		<description>I found a document about Web Applications Packaging Format Requirements here. http://www.w3.org/TR/WAPF-REQ/
There is a working group for standardising application packaging for distribution and deployment on the web. And this requirements does not only includes mobile phone but also various devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a document about Web Applications Packaging Format Requirements here. <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/WAPF-REQ/" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/TR/WAPF-REQ/</a><br />
There is a working group for standardising application packaging for distribution and deployment on the web. And this requirements does not only includes mobile phone but also various devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
