<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new patent war ahead : Surfkitchen on dynamic download?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.landspurg.net/a-new-patent-war-ahead-surfkitchen-on-dynamic-download/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/a-new-patent-war-ahead-surfkitchen-on-dynamic-download/</link>
	<description>Technology, wireless, games...and more.....</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frédéric Martinent</title>
		<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/a-new-patent-war-ahead-surfkitchen-on-dynamic-download/#comment-23086</link>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Martinent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.landspurg.net/a-new-patent-war-ahead-surfkitchen-on-dynamic-download#comment-23086</guid>
		<description>No, a technical solution that is already "known" by the industry cannot be patented.

See &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentability" rel="nofollow"&gt; Wikipedia article on "patentability"&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, a technical solution that is already &#8220;known&#8221; by the industry cannot be patented.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentability" rel="nofollow"> Wikipedia article on &#8220;patentability&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic Brunel</title>
		<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/a-new-patent-war-ahead-surfkitchen-on-dynamic-download/#comment-21170</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic Brunel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 05:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.landspurg.net/a-new-patent-war-ahead-surfkitchen-on-dynamic-download#comment-21170</guid>
		<description>Can a patent be allowed after the technique is broadly in used? I'm not so sure... I would be too easy to do that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can a patent be allowed after the technique is broadly in used? I&#8217;m not so sure&#8230; I would be too easy to do that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Enrique Ortiz</title>
		<link>http://blog.landspurg.net/a-new-patent-war-ahead-surfkitchen-on-dynamic-download/#comment-20779</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Enrique Ortiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.landspurg.net/a-new-patent-war-ahead-surfkitchen-on-dynamic-download#comment-20779</guid>
		<description>Yes, the concern is having to waste time and resources defending against someone who patentd an idea that is NOT new or innovative; sending an SMS for notification or to trigger further processing is not innovative or new! 

ceo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the concern is having to waste time and resources defending against someone who patentd an idea that is NOT new or innovative; sending an SMS for notification or to trigger further processing is not innovative or new! </p>
<p>ceo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
